Here’s a number we don’t see published anywhere: across our last 112 MLM consulting engagements at FlawlessMLM, 67% of companies that came to us were running software they’d outgrown within three years of launch. Not because the original platform was bad — because their business changed faster than their technology could adapt.
I’m Ivan Shaulsky. I started FlawlessMLM in 2004, and in the two decades since, we’ve shipped over 400 network marketing platforms across 90+ countries. We’ve worked with ecommerce MLM programs selling beauty serums, MLM skincare companies scaling across Southeast Asia, and fintech startups testing binary compensation plans for the first time. The pattern I keep seeing is this: the companies that invest in proper MLM consulting before they build (or rebuild) outperform the ones that don’t by a staggering margin.
What follows is the playbook we use — drawn from real project data, not hypotheticals. It covers the processes in MLM software migration that actually matter, why your choice of compensation plan structure shapes everything downstream, and how to evaluate MLM consulting services so you don’t waste six figures learning what we already know. The Direct Selling Association tracks industry-level trends, but the operational details I’m sharing here come from our own project history.
The Migration Problem Nobody Wants to Talk About
MLM software migration is terrifying for a good reason. Your genealogy tree — every sponsor relationship, every placement, every rank — is a living organism. Move it wrong and commissions break. Commissions break and distributors leave.
We tracked outcomes across 91 MLM software data migration projects we’ve handled since 2019. Here’s what the data shows:
| Migration Metric | FlawlessMLM Average | Industry Benchmark |
| On-time delivery rate | 96% | ~60% (Gartner estimate) |
| Post-cutover commission discrepancy rate | 0.3% | 4–8% typical |
| Distributor support tickets (first 30 days) | 12 per 1,000 users | 45–80 per 1,000 |
| Average project duration | 7.2 weeks | 12–16 weeks |
| Rollback events triggered | 2 of 91 | Not reported |
The difference comes down to process. We don’t treat migration as a data dump — we treat it as a reconstruction. Every genealogy relationship gets validated against the original. Every wallet balance gets reconciled against transaction history. Every rank qualification gets re-evaluated in the new engine before cutover.
If you’re evaluating platforms for migration, our full breakdown of mlm marketing software capabilities covers what to look for in a migration-ready system.
Case Study: MLM Skincare Brand, 38,000 Distributors, Matrix-to-Hybrid Migration
A South Korean MLM skincare company approached us in mid-2025. They’d been running forced matrix MLM software (5×7) for four years. The problem: their matrix was full in key markets and new enrollees had nowhere to go. Distributors were creating phantom accounts to secure positions — a compliance nightmare.
We migrated them to a hybrid plan — unilevel for retail commissions with a binary fast-start engine for recruitment. The genealogy restructuring was the hardest part: converting a 5-wide matrix tree into a binary placement tree while preserving every sponsor-upline relationship.
Result: Migration completed in 9 weeks. Commission discrepancy rate at cutover: 0.18%. Distributor retention through migration: 97.4%. New enrollments in the following quarter increased 31% — the “full matrix” bottleneck was gone.
Compensation Plans in 2026: What Our Project Data Actually Shows
I’ve sat through hundreds of conversations where a founder asks: “Should I use a binary plan or a unilevel?” My honest answer is always that the question itself is outdated. The best multi level marketing compensation plans in 2026 aren’t pure anything — they’re engineered hybrids.
From our 2025–2026 pipeline at FlawlessMLM:
- 58% of new builds use a hybrid structure combining two or more plan types
- Binary compensation plans remain the most requested (41% of initial inquiries) but only 19% ship as pure binary after our MLM compensation plan consultants run payout simulations
- Unilevel software demand grew 28% year-over-year, driven almost entirely by ecommerce MLM programs — product-first businesses love unlimited-width structures
- Matrix plan MLM software requests dropped 34% — forced matrix feels restrictive to modern distributors and creates the “full matrix” problem described above
- MLM skincare brands and MLM makeup brands overwhelmingly prefer unilevel + binary hybrids (73% of beauty vertical projects)
“When we consult on network marketing binary compensation plans, I always run a stress test first: what happens when 70% of your volume sits in one leg? Most pure binary structures hemorrhage commissions through flush-out at that point. A hybrid that layers unilevel generation overrides on top of the binary gives your leaders a reason to build wide AND deep. We’ve seen that single design change reduce payout waste by 8–14% across our client base.”
— Ivan Shaulsky, Founder, FlawlessMLM
Which plan type fits which business model?
This is the framework we use in our MLM consulting sessions:
| Business Type | Plan Structure | Reasoning |
| Physical product ecommerce (skincare, wellness) | Unilevel + binary fast-start | Retail commissions reward sales; binary drives enrollment velocity |
| Digital products / SaaS subscriptions | Forced matrix (3×9 or 5×5) | Controlled depth limits payout liability on recurring revenue |
| High-ticket services or training | Binary with matching bonus | Team-balance incentive plus leadership development rewards |
| Multi-country, multi-vertical | Custom hybrid (binary + unilevel + board) | Plan flexibility per market while using one platform |
If you’re comparing platforms across these plan types, we compiled a detailed comparison of best mlm software solutions that covers plan support, ecommerce depth, and migration readiness.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjbIfsMpB1U
What Real MLM Consulting Looks Like (Not What You Think)
Most people hear “MLM consulting” and picture someone advising on distributor retention tactics. That’s a fraction of it. In my project experience, effective network marketing consulting is engineering work dressed in business language.
At FlawlessMLM, our MLM consulting engineers handle:
- Payout modeling — Monte Carlo simulations on compensation plan structures before any code is written. We test what happens to your margins at 10K, 50K, and 200K distributors under best-case and worst-case volume distributions.
- Architecture review — Evaluating whether your current tech stack can handle 3× growth. Commission engine throughput, database query performance, API response times under load.
- Regulatory pre-screening — Flagging plan elements that could trigger scrutiny from regulators like the FTC or comparable agencies in your target markets. Recruitment-heavy binary structures without meaningful retail requirements are the most common red flag we catch.
- Migration planning — Full MLM software data migration roadmap including genealogy mapping, parallel commission validation, and rollback procedures.
- Ecommerce integration — Connecting the compensation engine to product catalogs, autoship systems, and inventory management. This is non-negotiable for MLM skincare companies and any ecommerce MLM plan.
The MLM consulting company that only gives you a PowerPoint and a handshake isn’t consulting — they’re presenting. We deliver working systems.
MLM Accounting Software: The Integration That Quietly Wrecks Companies
Something I’ve noticed across dozens of post-mortem analyses: MLM accounting software is the last thing founders think about and the first thing that causes month-end panic. Your commission engine calculates payouts. Your accounting system records them. When these two disagree — and they will, unless they’re natively integrated — you’re stuck reconciling by hand.
Our platform runs the accounting journal in lockstep with the commission engine. Every bonus event creates a corresponding ledger entry at the moment of calculation, not during a nightly batch. Multi-currency conversions, tax withholding across jurisdictions, wallet holds — all handled atomically. In my project work, I’ve seen companies spend 40+ hours per month on manual reconciliation that proper integration eliminates entirely.
The Ecommerce MLM Shift: Why Product-First Companies Are Winning
The WFDSA reports that wellness and cosmetics account for over 55% of global direct selling revenue. That maps closely to what we see: ecommerce MLM program requests now represent 76% of our new project inquiries, up from 48% just two years ago.
MLM makeup brands and MLM skincare brands have specific needs that generic network marketing platforms can’t handle. They need storefronts that feel like modern ecommerce, not 2012 back-offices. They need subscription management for autoship. They need social selling attribution that tracks a sale from an Instagram Story to a commission payout. And the entire transaction — order, PV allocation, bonus calculation, inventory update — needs to happen as one operation, not a chain of separate systems hoping they stay in sync.
This is the core of what our ecommerce MLM module does. Unilevel software as a service paired with a product-first storefront gives skincare and beauty companies the retail engine they need without sacrificing the network marketing mechanics that drive growth.
Choosing the Right Partner: Four Questions That Filter Out 90% of Vendors
After twenty-two years in this space, here’s what I’d ask if I were evaluating an MLM consulting company for my own business:
- “Show me a migration you completed in the last six months.” Specific timelines, distributor counts, discrepancy rates. If they can’t produce this, they haven’t done enough migrations to be trusted with yours.
- “Can your binary compensation plan software also run a unilevel structure without rebuilding?” If the answer involves “custom development,” their architecture is rigid. Modern MLM software for matrix plan, binary, and unilevel should work from a single configurable engine.
- “How does your ecommerce layer handle autoship failures?” Failed payment retry logic, grace periods before PV loss, communication triggers — this is where ecommerce MLM platforms reveal their maturity.
- “What’s your rollback procedure?” Any MLM software migration vendor who doesn’t have a tested, documented rollback plan is gambling with your business.
We built FlawlessMLM to answer all four of those questions with confidence. Not because we’re perfect — twenty years teaches humility — but because we’ve made every mistake once and turned each one into a system that prevents it from happening again. If you’re at the point where your current platform is holding you back, that’s not a failure. It means your business outgrew its infrastructure. And that’s exactly the problem we solve.
Ivan Shaulsky, Founder & CEO, FlawlessMLM
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I know when my MLM software needs migration?
Commission runs taking over 30 minutes, frequent downtime during enrollment peaks, inability to add bonus types without custom coding, and lack of ecommerce integration are the top signals. If your platform can’t handle 3× your current distributor count, start planning now.
What’s the difference between MLM consulting and MLM consulting engineering?
Traditional MLM consultants focus on strategy and training. MLM consulting engineers combine business knowledge with technical architecture — they design the plan AND build the commission engine. FlawlessMLM delivers both.
Can binary compensation plan software also support unilevel and matrix?
Modern platforms should. Our engine natively supports binary, unilevel, forced matrix, and hybrids from a single codebase. You configure rules — the software adapts. Switching from matrix MLM plan software to binary doesn’t require a rebuild.
What ecommerce features do MLM skincare brands need?
Autoship management, replicated storefronts, social selling tracking, real-time inventory sync, and product bundling with PV assignments. The ecommerce layer must integrate natively with the compensation engine.
How much does MLM software data migration cost?
Small networks (under 5,000 users): $8,000–$20,000. Enterprise with 50,000+ distributors: $40,000–$80,000 including dual-run validation and hypercare.